Review Process
Every manuscript submitted by an author will undergo an initial evaluation by the editorial team.
At this stage, the editor will examine whether the manuscript aligns with the focus and scope of the journal and ensure that the format and structure comply with the journal’s guidelines or template.
If the manuscript does not meet these criteria, the editor reserves the right to reject the submission without proceeding to the peer review stage.
However, if deemed suitable, the manuscript will be forwarded to reviewers for further assessment.
Peer Review Process
Manuscripts that pass the initial screening will be sent to at least two independent reviewers for a double-blind peer review process.
During this stage, reviewers will evaluate the manuscript based on several aspects, including:
- The novelty and originality of the research
- Objectivity of the analysis and discussion
- Appropriateness of the research methodology
- Scientific contribution and significance of the findings
- Clarity of conclusions
- Accuracy and completeness of references
Reviewers will provide recommendations such as:
- Revision required,
- Accepted, or
- Rejected.
Upon receiving the reviewers’ feedback, the editor will reassess their recommendations and determine whether the manuscript meets the journal’s publication standards.
Final Decision
The final decision regarding the acceptance or rejection of a manuscript lies entirely with the Editor-in-Chief, and this decision is final and cannot be appealed.
